tagline
About EJ Magazine
About the Knight Center
spacer1
Subscribe


spacer2
Archives
spacer3
Contact Us
13
13b
knight logo
bottom


WWW
EJ Magazine
header

Chemical Burn

Skin cancer isn't the only thing sunbathers should worry about.

During the hot days of summer, most people slather on sunscreen and call it a day. However, mounting evidence indicates that the very product used for protection may be quietly causing us—and the earth—serious harm.

Sunbathers, take heed.

sunscreen
Click to enlarge

At stake are the oceans’ coral reefs and human health.

Eighty-three percent of 912 name-brand sunscreens tested for safe ingredients and acceptable protection against UVA and UVB rays did not meet standards set by the Environmental Working Group, a non-profit agency of researchers and scientists. The organization measured the toxicity rating as well as how quickly UVA and UVB protection broke down, according to research analyst Kristan Markey.


The study found that sunscreen with a high sun protection factor, or SPF, may not be the ticket to dodge skin cancer and age gracefully. While many consumers judge the potency of sunscreen by its SPF rating, the study has shown this rating to be insufficient in judging a product’s cancer protection. SPF is concerned with UVB rays and for the most part ignores UVA rays.

Of the products tested, 13 percent did not protect against UVA rays, which are responsible for skin cancer. Luckily, this confusion about sun protection may be cleared up in the near future. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, a new four-star product rating system has been proposed, which would rate the strength of UVA protection in an easy-to-understand fashion. 

But sun protection isn’t the only concern. The study also found that toxic chemicals in sunscreen absorb into the blood and cause health issues linked to hormone problems and allergic reactions.

 “We’re especially concerned with the active sunscreen ingredients because you’re supposed to smear this into your body every couple of hours,” Markey said.

Although testers found changes in estrogen levels linked to sunscreen usage, the more obvious damage can be found in the environment, Markey said.

Common ingredients in sunscreen are washing off swimmers and getting into water. These chemicals interfere with a specific algae living on the coral reef that provides nourishment and essential photosynthesis in the reefs, according to a January 2008 study conducted by Environmental Health Perspectives, a research journal. Without this alga, the reefs are dying. According to Markey, the beaches of California and Hawaii are most plagued with this problem.

Consumers can avoid potentially toxic sunscreen by avoiding brands that use ingredients such as benzophenone-3, homosalate, 4-methyl-benzylidene camphor, octyl-methoxycinnamate, octyl-dimethyl-PABA, and butyl-methoxydibenzoylmethane, which have been shown to cause problems with estrogenic changes and reef bleaching. 

The Environmental Working Group also recommends safe-to-use brands at cosmeticsdatabase.com. Topping the list are Badger, SPF 30; Keys Soap Solar RX Therapeutic Sunblock, SPF 30; and ColoreScience Sunforgettable Rock and Roller Ball, SPF 30. 

Of course you can always just stay out of the sun. Switch a day hike to the morning to get out of the sun, lie under a tree, or claim the patio table with an umbrella. The earth (and your skin) will thank you.

Cara Binder is a senior studying journalism at MSU with a specialty in women, gender, and social justice. This is her first appearance in EJ. Contact Cara at binderca@msu.edu.

BACK TO TOP

printfriendly

printer

Fast.

pdf

Pretty.

 

utility_leftSite Maputility_line1Webmasterutility_line2Legal Infolegal

This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer or Firefox on PCs and in Safari on Macs.